Optimize rheology, strength & sustainability in adhesives with Omyabond solutions

Last update on Jul 30, 2025

This is a sponsored article by Omya.


In modern adhesive and sealant development, formulation requirements extend beyond mechanical performance—demanding enhanced sustainability, process efficiency, and cost control, all while maintaining high end-product quality.

Omya meets these formulation challenges with two high-performance mineral solutions—Omyabond 120 and Omyabond 160. Engineered to outperform traditional fillers, these are multifunctional performance additives, combining rheological control, reinforcement, and sustainability benefits, helping formulators streamline and elevate their adhesive formulations.

Get tips on how selecting the right Omyabond mineral solutions can enhance the overall adhesive performance.

Why consider treated calcium carbonate?

 

Conventional rheological modifiers such as fumed silica or polyamide waxes come with challenges—pre-drying steps, moisture sensitivity, addition difficulty, and carbon-intensive footprints.



Omyabond 120 and Omyabond 160 are ultrafine treated calcium carbonate grades that break those boundaries:
 

  • Easy to disperse
  • Low moisture content
  • High reinforcing effect
  • Strong rheological control
  • Exceptionally low product carbon footprint

 

Omyabond 120: Prioritize flexibility and moisture control

 

If you're formulating SMP adhesives or reactive sealants, Omyabond 120 fulfils all the requirements. It combines the mechanical strength of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) with the moisture stability and simplicity of ground calcium carbonate (GCC)—without the process hitches.

 

Key highlights

 

  • Particle size (D50): 0.3 μm
  • BET surface area: 14 m²/g
  • Moisture content: < 0.1 %
  • Specific rheology profile
  • No need for fumed silica or wax modifiers


 

Fig 1: Water pick-up comparison of Omyabond 120 vs PCC


 

While PCC shows a sharp increase in water uptake with rising humidity, Omyabond 120 maintains consistently low moisture levels. This low moisture absorption translates to extended storage stability, reduced need for moisture scavengers, and the ability to eliminate pre-drying steps—offering both quality and cost advantages in reactive adhesive formulations.

 

Mechanical mastery - Omyabond 120

 

 


 

FormulationPA waxFumed silicaOmyabond 120
SMP polymer25.925.925.9
Plasticizer18.018.018.0
PA wax3.0--
Fumed silica-3.0-
2 μm treated GCC49.749.7-
Omyabond 120--52.7
Additives (Moisture scavenger, stabilizer, catalyst)3.43.43.4
Mechanical properties at ISO 37
Modulus 100 % [MPa]0.70.50.5
Tensile strength [MPa]1.51.72.0
Elongation at break [%]540660990

 

Table 1: Mechanical comparison: Fumed silica vs Omyabond 120



Notably, the formulation can be refined by reducing polymer content while maintaining mechanical performance—enabling cost optimization through lower raw material consumption and improved processing efficiency.

Replace treated GCC and fumed silica in an elastic adhesive, and achieve - 
 

  • 3.0 MPa tensile strength (up from 2.3)
  • 370 % elongation (up from 300)
  • Lower modulus (more flexibility)

 


Result: Better performance, fewer components, simpler processing, and lower energy use.

 

 

Omyabond 160: The green powerhouse for high-modulus formulations

 

More than fulfilling the purpose of a filler, Omyabond 160 is a reinforcing ultrafine calcium carbonate that is superior to fumed silica in rheological performance and also surpasses it in mechanical strength and sustainability.

 

Key highlights
 

  • Designed for hybrid and silicone adhesives
  • Optimized for high-modulus systems
  • Median size: 0.3 μm
  • BET surface area: 14 m²/g
  • Moisture: < 0.2 %
  • PCF: only 214 kg CO₂e/ton (independently verified)


 

FormulationFumed silica [parts]Omyabond 160 [parts]
High modulus SMP polymer30.030.0
Plasticizer14.014.0
Adhesion promoter0.60.6
VTMO1.01.0
Catalyst0.40.4
Fumed silica4.0-
GCC - 1 μm D50 %50.0-
Omyabond 160-54.0
Rheology 1 day, RT, measured at 23°C
Viscosity at 0.1 s-1 [Pa.s]28203180
Viscosity at 10 s-1 [Pa.s]7595
Mechanical properties at ISO 37
Modulus at 100 % [MPa]1.31.7
Tensile strength [MPa]2.83.5
Elongation [%]510455

 

Table 2: Omyabond 160 - Comparison with fumed silica in terms of rheology and strength



Switching from fumed silica to Omyabond 160 delivers: 
 


 

 

Rheology you can trust

 


Omyabond 160 matches the anti-slump and shear-thinning attributes of fumed silica, with added formulation flexibility:
 

  • No dusting issues
  • Stable viscosity
  • Easy processing at ambient conditions

 


 

Omyabond 120 vs. Omyabond 160: Which one should you choose?


 

FeatureOmyabond 120Omyabond 160
Target systemsSMP/Reactive sealantsHybrid/Silicone adhesives
Reinforcement profileMedium modulus, high flexibilityHigh modulus, stiff reinforcement
Rheological roleReplaces silica & waxesReplaces fumed silica
Moisture content< 0.1 %< 0.2 %
Typical benefitsFlexibility, elongation, low modulusHigh strength, high adhesion, modulus
Processing advantageCold mixing, easy handlingExcellent dispersion, storage stable
Sustainability edgeLess moisture scavenger, low energyUltra-low CO₂ footprint
 
Table 3: Omyabond 120 vs. Omyabond 160
 
 

 

Final thoughts

 

Choosing the right mineral filler isn’t just a technical choice, it’s a strategic one. With Omyabond 120 and 160, Omya offers reliable, performance-driven, and sustainable solutions that help you:
 

  • Improve formulation performance
  • Reduce complexity and cost
  • Meet tightening environmental and market demands

 


It’s time to improve your adhesives—not just with chemistry, but with smarter mineral choices.


Interested in sample formulations or testing support? Reach out to Omya's technical team at construction@omya.com


DISCLAIMER: All figures, tables, and graphs used in this article are copyright of Omya.